Production reads use curated sources and human-approved claims. When two sources assert incompatible values, both claims stay linked until a curator chooses a resolution. That behaviour is deliberate: a tidy map that hides the disagreement would be less accurate than a map that shows it.

What you get

  • Provenance is stored, not implied Official releases and news reports remain attached to the claims drawn from them.
  • Extraction does not publish itself Automated extract stays off in production until the design for it is accepted. What the public sees has been approved by a person.
  • Contradiction is a state, not a bug to hide Incompatible claims stay linked until a curator chooses one side, the other, or neither.

How we work

  1. Take the source

    Official documents, government notices, news, and papers are the inputs.

  2. Review the claim

    A curator approves or rejects it. Rejected material does not become a public read.

  3. Resolve or keep the conflict

    If sources disagree, both claims remain until a person marks the outcome.

Deliverables

  • Curated entity schemas
  • Human-approved datasets
  • A conflict state the public map can show
Case studies

Related work

Contact

Write to Diaphana

For questions about the published work, or about software in the same line, write to matt@diaphana.co.